Many people assume that a
Social Security disability case is over when the hearing has been held.
This isn't always the case. Often there is post hearing work that
should be done to achieve the best chance of a favorable decision.
Everyone
at a disability hearing works under pressure. This includes the
claimant, the representative, the vocational expert and even the
administrative law judge. Hearings are generally limited to less than
one hour. The judge will ask questions that place the claimant under
stress to answer correctly. The representative or attorney will be
asked to respond to procedural issues or points of law that place him or
her under pressure. The judge must constantly conduct the hearing so
that it follows Social Security laws, rules and regulations. Further,
the judge must form accurate hypothetical questions for the vocational
expert based on the medical and vocational evidence in the file and upon
the claimant's testimony. The vocational expert then has less than a
minute to respond to complicated hypothetical questions with very
complicated sets of facts.
After
the hearing is over and the pressure is off - facts and responses will
come to mind that may not have occurred during the hearing. Therefore,
it is fitting for the representative to submit a concise post hearing
brief or letter that brings up points of law, facts that may have been
missed during testimony or more detailed answers to the judge's
questions. There may be challenges or clarifications that need to be made toward the vocational expert's testimony.
Finally,
if there is new evidence, it should be submitted as promptly as
possible after the hearing. As a rule, it will take the judge about 45
days to reach a decision - after the hearing is over. That provides a
window of opportunity to clear up any questions or concerns that came up
during the hearing. Obviously, if you know that post hearing work is
in order you should inform the judge during the hearing and ask for a
specific period of time to leave the record open for submission of new
evidence.
No comments:
Post a Comment